tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28877444.post5945312115253087083..comments2022-02-21T02:50:40.453-05:00Comments on Founder Transitions - This is my OLD Blog, Please go to FounderTransitions.com for my new Blog: Business DebriefingLeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11948765334324756239noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28877444.post-1475013207783278152009-02-02T10:01:00.000-05:002009-02-02T10:01:00.000-05:00Good point Sinclair. Here's what I've used to hand...Good point Sinclair. Here's what I've used to handle situations where results can be specifically measured:<BR/><BR/>1) Create an expected result set<BR/>2) Analyze actual results received vs. expected results<BR/>3) Determine action to be taken<BR/>4) Revise expectations, and<BR/>5) Repeat<BR/><BR/>In other situations, simply recording the results (the important parts - not all the details) and distributing them or making them available is also helpful. Most of the time if it isn't written down, it doesn't really exist (and more important people forget).Leshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11948765334324756239noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28877444.post-89609800217731093772009-02-02T09:57:00.000-05:002009-02-02T09:57:00.000-05:00This comment has been removed by the author.Leshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11948765334324756239noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28877444.post-77936955281503910892009-02-02T09:40:00.000-05:002009-02-02T09:40:00.000-05:00Les,I really like this approach. One question that...Les,<BR/><BR/>I really like this approach. One question that comes to mind is how to filter signal from noise. I imagine that when collecting feedback, one can get caught up in listening to too much information and miss the real signal, causing adjustments to be off. It seems like it would make most sense to identify one metric and follow it so as to not get distracted. Thoughts?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com